回复994楼::
我不知道你的狗娘是怎么养出你这么反华反倒自己祖宗身上的狗杂种，但你可以好好看看你美爹，你日爹的说法。
====================================================================
The casualty count of 300,000 was first promulgated in January 1938 by Harold Timperley, a journalist in China during the Japanese invasion, based on reports from contemporary eyewitnesses.[107] Other sources, including Iris Chang's The Rape of Nanking, also conclude that the death toll reached 300,000. In December 2007, newly declassified U.S. government archive documents revealed that a telegraph by the U.S. ambassador to Germany in Berlin sent one day after the Japanese army occupied Nanjing, stated that he heard the Japanese ambassador in Germany boasting that the Japanese army had killed 500,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians as the Japanese army advanced from Shanghai to Nanjing. According to the archives research "The telegrams sent by the U.S. diplomats [in Berlin] pointed to the massacre of an estimated half a million people in Shanghai, Suzhou, Jiaxing, Hangzhou, Shaoxing, Wuxi and Changzhou".
====================================================================
Historian Tokushi Kasahara states "more than 100,000 and close to 200,000, or maybe more."[97] With the emergence of more information and data, he said that there is a possibility that the death toll could be higher. Hiroshi Yoshida concludes "more than 200,000" in his book.[98] Tomio Hora supports the information found in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, which estimates a death toll of at least 200,000.[99][100] An estimate death toll of 300,000 has also been cited.

: 30万根本没有铁证，比饿死3000万的证据差远了。党史都承认了饿死1000万，你们五毛不是照样嘴硬？